David and Victoria Beckham have once again found themselves embroiled in a heated dispute with neighbours, who accuse them of “building first and asking for permission later” — branding the application a “joke” as they renovate their £12 million estate

David and Victoria Beckham have once again found themselves at the centre of a growing row with neighbours — this time over fresh plans for their sprawling £12million Cotswolds estate.

The former England captain, 50, and fashion mogul, 51, originally snapped up the once-rundown property back in 2016 for around £6.5million. Since then, they’ve transformed it into a luxury countryside retreat — complete with lakes, outbuildings and high-end features — now believed to be worth nearly double.

But their latest proposal has reignited tensions in the quiet Oxfordshire village.

The couple have applied for permission to plant 79 trees and create a wildflower meadow — a move they say will boost privacy and enhance the natural landscape around their home. The planting scheme includes a mix of native species such as English oak, field maple and Scots pine, designed to form a woodland-style boundary shielding the estate from view.

The plans come after previous security concerns, including attempted break-ins at both their London and countryside homes, which reportedly led to 24-hour protection measures being introduced.

Alongside the planting, David and Victoria also want to formalise an upgraded access route — converting what was once an agricultural track into a permanent driveway with controlled security gates.

But for some locals, it’s not the proposal itself — it’s the timing.

Neighbour James Worthington has lodged a formal objection backed by 45 pages of evidence, claiming much of the work has already been carried out. He said the application was “just a joke,” questioning why permission is being sought after the road, gates, electricity supply and fencing appear to already be in place. He warned that if approved, the property risks becoming “a fortress” in the heart of the countryside.

Another resident, Joan Lane, also voiced strong opposition, arguing the estate already has a perfectly usable access route. She said laying more tarmac through woodland makes little sense and could disrupt walkers who regularly use the lane, adding that large SUVs would spoil the peaceful rural setting.

The Beckhams, however, insist the changes are modest and necessary. In planning documents, their representatives describe the project as a “sensitively designed conversion” aimed at improving safety, access and overall functionality — while still preserving the heritage and natural character of the area.

They also argue the current single-lane access — which doubles as the only route to the exclusive Soho Farmhouse retreat — is increasingly unsafe due to heavy traffic, particularly during busy summer months when celebrities and members flock to the hotspot.

This isn’t the first time the couple’s countryside ambitions have sparked controversy.

Over the years, they’ve faced criticism for a string of developments at the Grade II-listed property — from a man-made lake and sandbank to a treehouse, tennis court, and even a reported underground tunnel and wine cellar.

Their artificial beach area is currently under investigation by local council officials following complaints it may not comply with earlier planning agreements. A source claimed neighbours feel the additions are “out of character” and are increasingly concerned about whether rules are being followed.

Despite the backlash, the Beckhams maintain their vision is rooted in enhancing both privacy and sustainability — though critics argue the estate is slowly evolving into something far removed from its rural origins.

A final decision from West Oxfordshire District Council is expected in due course — but one thing is clear: this countryside saga is far from over.